Advertisement
Nityananda=Manu="Bhakti yogi"=spiritual geeks=scripture copiers=fanatical Krishna fans with little understanding=misinterpreters in Bhagavad Gita=Idiots
This tribe is for people who have creativity, imagination, understanding, open-heart to share true feelings and be themselves , not for people who come here to preach their Bible under Krishna's name without even knowing what their scripture is really talking about.
This tribe is for people who have creativity, imagination, understanding, open-heart to share true feelings and be themselves , not for people who come here to preach their Bible under Krishna's name without even knowing what their scripture is really talking about.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Fri, June 3, 2005 - 11:53 PMso what it is talking about sweetheart
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Sat, June 4, 2005 - 9:14 AMsweet sweet empty headed mira. u obviously have no idea what u are saying. i am by no means, not by any stretch of the imagination, a fanatic. i am probably the most unorthodox krsna devotee u will meet. to call me an idiot based on what u have read in my posts is a superficial analysis at best.
now, to tell us we misinterpret shastra.... this is quite a sweeping generalization u foolish person. DO U UNDERSTAND SANSKRIT? can u translate it and read it? if not, than ur opinion on bhakti and shastra is of little or no consequence. and to clarify this tribe is called bhakti yoga!!!! we are bhaktas, so ur wishy washy concocted philosophy is fine, just please have the class and grace to understand that, bhakti yoga is PRECISELY FOR THE TYPE OF IDIOTS u claim we are.
instead of name calling y dont u share ur wisdom on bhakti/ bhakti shastras/ and all the bhaktas who have given us this type of yoga. i mean do u even know that usually when ppl say bhakti yoga they are automatically referring to lord krsna's devotees?
probably not, and you dare tell me i am polluting this tribe. you are an audacious one. i just looked at ur profile and realized look at the time i am wasting, this person is just a troll.
better i spend my time on bhakti. anything to add mira? i should think not. at any rate, the respect and courtesy i have received from the wonderful ppl i have met on tribe far outweighs ur outrageous comments. ohhhh and y dont YOU try and explain the gita to me. u cant. cuz there is no misinterpreting it. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Sat, June 4, 2005 - 2:03 PMthe gita is not a explanation
it is a experience - that needs nothing
lest of all any defense
you aint in control
nobody is....
if you have no experience you cling to explanations and become defensive - someone pushes a button and the arrogant monster you are becomes obvious - its pretty boring and pathetic
now if you experience this which is beyond all yer silly narrow BS....
and WOW! What breathtaking simple refreshing depth existence is
i dunno if there is any end!!!
lets look and see:)))
who cares about something as shallow and unexplored as opinion and explanations???
really!!!
Who cares! WHO?!
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Sat, June 4, 2005 - 8:14 PMIf i am travelling to a distant city it is useful to have a belief in it, but one i reach the city, what use is believing. Experiencing is the thing though.
If one experiences Nitya and Manu as eedeotes, then so be it, hehehe. I choose to experience them as words on the window of my computer. Maybe we should arrange a get-together in some spot central to us all to find out. Maybe, say, the middle of the Pacific?
Rgds,
PB.
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Sun, June 5, 2005 - 11:58 AMi think that if someone pushes a button- it is uncalled for, but u would hardly agree with that, since all u do is insult. u talk about experience, but really u care about no ones experience but ur own. and it is arrogant to ASSUME that we misinterpret the gita as all of us practionners have assumed a humble position to learn from someone who knows more than us. this is the process of learning, be it material or spiritual.
i disagree that no one is in control, if u READ the gita u would understand that krsna is in control and that the only control we can exert is that of our senses.
u ask who cares? well, to answer succintly, the one that wishes to learn, taste and experience is the one who cares.
honestly, if u cared at all about bhakti, u would not defend ppl who offend gratuitously.
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Sat, June 4, 2005 - 2:57 PMAre you saying that anybody's opinion on bhakti, who does not understand sanskrit, is of little or no consequence? -
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Sun, June 5, 2005 - 10:22 PMO BTW I have read, written and spoken Sanskrit for 10 years in School and University. So again Hahaha
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Sun, June 5, 2005 - 10:25 PMOne of the most beautiful Bhakti exponent was Amir Khusro, a persian who who is the most reveared mystic even today in India (for both Muslims and Hindus). I do not think he ever read Sanskrit or sang praises of Krishna, but his heart was Bhakti. Pure Bhakti. I suggest hearing Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan or Abida Parveen sing his beautiful poetry sometime. It is beyond arguments, pure Bhakti -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 9:29 AMThanks for the info. I haven't heard of Khurso and
Abida Parveen before. Any links you may have for a beginner?
For me the door to Bhakti was the Bengali songs of Ramprasad Sen and Kamalakanta (in English translation. My Bengali is so far restricted to reading the script and some very basics... working on it...) -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 3:41 PMAmir Khusro was a fourteenth century saint mystic whose imagery of his deep desire to be one with the almighty every time brings tears to my eyes (and to so many others I know).
Here is one website of his
www.alif-india.com/index.html
His poetry in modern times has been sung by many but my favorite is Abeeda Parveen and to some extent Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan. I would have recommended Sabri Brothers (Of the Naqshbandi order of Sufi's) also sing but they are really hard to understand (because they are the best ;-)
Here is a sample: Go to the last song "Chaap tilak sab Cheeni"
Go to
www.musicindiaonline.com
And search for Abida Parveen. Go to the last song "Chaap tilak sab Cheeni" of page one.
Enjoy
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 3:49 PMIn nut shell the song translates to "you have snatched all deceptions of symbols/lineage/Scriptures by just looking in my eyes" It is a devotional Qawwali where Amir Khurso writes for the Godhead and he writes as a female lover just one-pointed about her lover (The Big Guy)
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 10:52 AMso would you think that he found the eternal truth of bhakti or relative opinions of theosophy? Sanksrit or not is not question. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 12:19 PM"so would you think that he found the eternal truth of bhakti or relative opinions of theosophy? Sanksrit or not is not question. "
Eternal truth -- How would I know?
Theosophy -- Maybe. I did not look for that.
He did write a very inspired something that moves the hearts of millions of bhaktas over the last centuries to love and devotion to Ma.
-
-
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 10:50 AM"Are you saying that anybody's opinion on bhakti, who does not understand sanskrit, is of little or no consequence? "
yes opinions do not have any forebearing on a eternal truth. Your experiences while practicing well that is quite valuable. (for example, when I chant God names I fell really blisssful, or meditating on the Lord form really does it for me, or praying that really helps me) But I not interested in anybody's opinion. It is not politics. Bhakti stays eternally true and the same no matter what you opinion of is. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 12:15 PMI am in this discussion forum which is part of a social network for opinions, suggestions, advice and ideas from people. Maybe all this does not have any effect on the eternal truth of bhakti (whatever that is), but it will hopefully have effect on me and my way. Wish me luck.
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 3:45 PMBTW all you are saying and heard is also an opinion. Mind can only percieve opinions, soul may experience something else but for that you do not need validation of scriptures, Bhagwat Gita or Krishna for that matter. In the end they are all symbols. You can keep descibing water and quote scientist on properties of water but once you jump in it, H20 or Paani or Jal or neer or water really becomes irrelevant -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 3:56 PMbut if you think fire is what the call water it is not such a great experience. Jnana comes before vijnana, knowledge come before realization. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 7:32 AMjai ho! very well said. artsy i would disagree with u that krsna and shastra are merely symbols. this is to superficially analyze something which demands experience (like jumping in the water) and practice (difficult for the non practionner to understand.
AND, using ur own words, yours would be just another opinion, n'est ce pas?
and eylon i would just like to clarify, u mention devotion to Ma above? i would like to tell u that bhakti (devotion) to Ma (unless u are referring to bhakti devi, i.e. Radharani and i doubt that u are) would be an incorrect use of the term. Ma/devi/ durga/kali, however u call her is not in charge of receiving or discharging bhakti. this is not her position. she is the external energy of krsna. in charge of dealings in the material creation. so ppl pray to her for nice things, a nice husband, wife, good marks on an exam, etc etc. but not for bhakti. bhakti is aprakrta, beyond the prakriti (material creation) and, therefore, not what "ma" is in charge of. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 9:26 AMManu - thank you for clarifying the theological/theosophical position on Devi in the tradition you are part of. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 9:32 AMit is my pleasure eylon. but i would dare say, that it is not only the position of devi according to the tradition i belong to (gaudiya vaisnava) but according to that of the vedas, itihasas, and puranas. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 9:35 AMYou know I was trying to avoid an argument :) -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 9:57 AMi know ;) hehe. and u were very diplomatic. i am being playful, dont worry. even though i mean what i say ;)
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 11:27 AMManu, Vedas do not talk of Krishna or even Vishnu for that matter. They talk primarily of Indra, Agni, Varun, Vayu, Soma etc. as the primary deities. Upanishad talk primarily of Brahman and are not about Sri Krishna or Sri RadhaRani. Itihasa literally translates to "History" and is not a set of texts. As far as Puranas are concerned, they are stories depending on who wrote them, for example if you read shiv Mahapurana you will find stories of Krishna being a devotee of Lord Shiva doing penece on Mt. Kailash after getting initiated by Upmanyu. The opening of Vidyeshwar Samhita in Shiv Mahapuran states
"O revered Sages! The source of Vishnu, Rudra all the deities including myself and all the other creations is none other Mahadeo. Union with the Shiva should be the objective of a man to attain that objective. Listening to the qualities of Lord Shiva, singing devotional songs in his praise and contemplating on him are the greatest means, which help to unite with Shiva."
So please understand that every verse you can find of in Puranas about the primacy of a deity you can find a corresponding verse about another deity (including Vishnu, Shiva, Mahakali, MahaLaxmi). Puranas talk of Krishna as a incarnation of Vishnu, remember the primary Purana is Vishnu Mahapuran and not Krishna Purana. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 11:48 AMKali-santarana Upanisad
hare krsna hare krsna
krsna krsna hare hare
hare rama hare rama
rama rama hare hare
iti sodasakam namnam
kali-kalmasa-nasanam
natah parataropayah
sarva-vedesu drsyate
The sixteen words of the Hare Krishna mantra are especially meant for counteracting the sins of the age of Kali. To save oneself from the contamination of this age there is no alternative but to chant the Hare Krishna mantra. After searching through all the Vedic literatures one cannot find a method of religion for this age so sublime as the chanting of Hare Krishna.
Kali-santarana Upanisad verse 5-6
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 11:50 AMWhat Vyasadeva says in Bhagavatam about Krishna and Vedas
SB 1.4.15: Once upon a time he [Vyāsadeva], as the sun rose, took his morning ablution in the waters of the Sarasvatī and sat alone to concentrate.
SB 1.4.16: The great sage Vyāsadeva saw anomalies in the duties of the millennium. This happens on the earth in different ages, due to unseen forces in the course of time.
SB 1.4.17-18: The great sage, who was fully equipped in knowledge, could see, through his transcendental vision, the deterioration of everything material, due to the influence of the age. He could also see that the faithless people in general would be reduced in duration of life and would be impatient due to lack of goodness. Thus he contemplated for the welfare of men in all statuses and orders of life.
SB 1.4.19: He saw that the sacrifices mentioned in the Vedas were means by which the people's occupations could be purified. And to simplify the process he divided the one Veda into four, in order to expand them among men.
SB 1.4.20: The four divisions of the original sources of knowledge [the Vedas] were made separately. But the historical facts and authentic stories mentioned in the Purāṇas are called the fifth Veda.
SB 1.4.21: After the Vedas were divided into four divisions, Paila Ṛṣi became the professor of the Ṛg Veda, Jaimini the professor of the Sāma Veda, and Vaiśampāyana alone became glorified by the Yajur Veda.
SB 1.4.22: The Sumantu Muni Ańgirā, who was very devotedly engaged, was entrusted with the Atharva Veda. And my father, Romaharṣaṇa, was entrusted with the Purāṇas and historical record
SB 1.4.23: All these learned scholars, in their turn, rendered their entrusted Vedas unto their many disciples, grand-disciples and great grand-disciples, and thus the respective branches of the followers of the Vedas came into being.
SB 1.4.24: Thus the great sage Vyāsadeva, who is very kind to the ignorant masses, edited the Vedas so they might be assimilated by less intellectual men.
SB 1.4.25: Out of compassion, the great sage thought it wise that this would enable men to achieve the ultimate goal of life. Thus he compiled the great historical narration called the Mahābhārata for women, laborers and friends of the twice-born.
SB 1.4.26: O twice-born brāhmaṇas, still his mind was not satisfied, although he engaged himself in working for the total welfare of all people.
SB 1.4.27: Thus the sage, being dissatisfied at heart, at once began to reflect, because he knew the essence of religion, and he said within himself:
SB 1.4.28-29: I have, under strict disciplinary vows, unpretentiously worshiped the Vedas, the spiritual master and the altar of sacrifice. I have also abided by the rulings and have shown the import of disciplic succession through the explanation of the Mahābhārata, by which even women, śūdras and others [friends of the twice-born] can see the path of religion.
SB 1.4.30: I am feeling incomplete, though I myself am fully equipped with everything required by the Vedas.
SB 1.4.31: This may be because I did not specifically point out the devotional service of the Lord, which is dear both to perfect beings and to the infallible Lord.
SB 1.4.32: As mentioned before, Nārada reached the cottage of Kṛṣṇa-dvaipāyana Vyāsa on the banks of the Sarasvatī just as Vyāsadeva was regretting his defects.
SB 1.4.33: At the auspicious arrival of Śrī Nārada, Śrī Vyāsadeva got up respectfully and worshiped him, giving him veneration equal to that given to Brahmājī, the creator.
and this is followed by Narada's instructions here
srimadbhagavatam.com/1/5/en
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 11:52 AMYou should also read books lke Isopanishad before you speak
Iso 12: Those who are engaged in the worship of demigods enter into the darkest region of ignorance, and still more so do the worshipers of the impersonal Absolute(Brahman).
Iso 13: It is said that one result is obtained by worshiping the supreme cause of all causes and that another result is obtained by worshiping what is not supreme. All this is heard from the undisturbed authorities, who clearly explained it.
Iso 14: One should know perfectly the Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa and His transcendental name, form, qualities and pastimes, as well as the temporary material creation with its temporary demigods, men and animals. When one knows these, he surpasses death and the ephemeral cosmic manifestation with it, and in the eternal kingdom of God he enjoys his eternal life of bliss and knowledge.
Iso 15: O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Kindly remove that covering and exhibit Yourself to Your pure devotee.
Iso 16: O my Lord, O primeval philosopher, maintainer of the universe, O regulating principle, destination of the pure devotees, well-wisher of the progenitors of mankind, please remove the effulgence of Your transcendental rays so that I can see Your form of bliss. You are the eternal Supreme Personality of Godhead, like unto the sun, as am I.
Iso 17: Let this temporary body be burnt to ashes, and let the air of life be merged with the totality of air. Now, O my Lord, please remember all my sacrifices, and because You are the ultimate beneficiary, please remember all that I have done for You.
Iso 18: O my Lord, as powerful as fire, O omnipotent one, now I offer You all obeisances, falling on the ground at Your feet. O my Lord, please lead me on the right path to reach You, and since You know all that I have done in the past, please free me from the reactions to my past sins so that there will be no hindrance to my progress.
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:02 PMI was six when I first remember Ishopnishad Puja in my home :-) and that was thirty years ago. Where were you at that time.
Peace man -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:10 PMI was probably 70 years old, maybe even doing the puja at you home? -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:41 PMhahahahahahaha very good one nitya!!!!
-
-
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:08 PMAnd where does Mahabharata (BTW sages call it the fifth Veda) fit in you estimation
kṛṣir bhū-vācakaḥ śabdo
ṇaś ca nirvṛti-vācakaḥ
tayor aikyaḿ paraḿ brahma
kṛṣṇa ity abhidhīyate
SYNONYMS
kṛṣiḥ — the verbal root kṛṣ; bhū — attractive existence; vācakaḥ — signifying; śabdaḥ — word; ṇaḥ — the syllable ṇa; ca — and; nirvṛti — spiritual pleasure; vācakaḥ — indicating; tayoḥ — of both; aikyam — amalgamation; param — supreme; brahma — Absolute Truth; kṛṣṇaḥ — Lord Kṛṣṇa; iti — thus; abhidhīyate — is called.
TRANSLATION
"'The word "kṛṣ" is the attractive feature of the Lord's existence, and "ṇa" means spiritual pleasure. When the verb "kṛṣ" is added to the affix "ṇa," it becomes "Kṛṣṇa," which indicates the Absolute Truth.'
This is a verse from the Mahābhārata (Udyoga-parva 71.4).
so is Bhagavd Gita also a separate text writing according to the whims of ascetics?
Bhagavad-gītā As It Is 15.15
sarvasya cāhaḿ hṛdi sanniviṣṭo
mattaḥ smṛtir jñānam apohanaḿ ca
vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyo
vedānta-kṛd veda-vid eva cāham
SYNONYMS
sarvasya — of all living beings; ca — and; aham — I; hṛdi — in the heart; sanniviṣṭaḥ — situated; mattaḥ — from Me; smṛtiḥ — remembrance; jñānam — knowledge; apohanam — forgetfulness; ca — and; vedaiḥ — by the Vedas; ca — also; sarvaiḥ — all; aham — I am; eva — certainly; vedyaḥ — knowable; vedānta-kṛt — the compiler of the Vedānta; veda-vit — the knower of the Vedas; eva — certainly; ca — and; aham — I.
TRANSLATION
I am seated in everyone's heart, and from Me come remembrance, knowledge and forgetfulness. By all the Vedas, I am to be known. Indeed, I am the compiler of Vedānta, and I am the knower of the Vedas.
Hmm? By all the Vedas I am to be known hmm what does that mean? -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:19 PMMahabharata was compiled around 300 AD and is not a part of Vedic literature. Which Sage are you talking about. Have you even read any of the Vedas? I would suggest you taking some more Sanskrit courses :-) "root" words in Sanskrit like "na" or "Krii" have no meaning, they are Sanskrit Alphabets, they have certain energies and based on that the word they contain are named. Geez ... anyways I am not too fond of this type of cut and paste discussion, so if you really are open to it WRITE SOMETHING from your head. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:38 PMWhen was Bhagavatam written by Vyasadeva?
Nayana-ranjana Das
From Bhagavata Mahatmya, Padma Purana, Uttara Khanda:
Saunaka asked, "O Suta Gosvami, when did Sukadeva recite the Bhagavatam to Pariksita, Gokarna to Dhundhukari, and the Kumaras to Narada Muni?"
Suta Gosvami replied, "About thirty years after Lord Krsna's departure to His abode, on the ninth day of the bright fortnight in the month of Bhadra, Sukadeva recited Bhagavatam to Pariksit. Two hundred years later in the month of Asadha, on the ninth day of the bright fortnight Gokarna recited Bhagavatam to Dhundhukari. Thirty years later, in the month of Karttika on the ninth day of the bright fortnight, the Kumaras recited it to Narada Muni."
SUMMARY
3150 BC: Battle of Kuruksetra
February 18, 3102 BC (around): Krsna's disappearance, beginning of Kali Yuga (Thus Krsna was present for around 125+48 = 173 years)
30 years after i.e 3072 BC: Sukadeva Goswami speaks Bhadra Navami Bhagavatam to Maharaj Pariksit
200 years later i.e. 2872 BC: Gokarna recited Bhagavatam to Dhundhukari on Asadha Navami
30 years later i.e. 2842 BC: Kumaras recited to Narada Muni on Karttika Navami
Around 2000 BC: Suta Goswami recited to the sages at Naimisaranya (long after the battle of Kuruksetra)
1000 BC: Compiling of Mahabharata
500 BC: Compiling of Ramayana
900 AD: Vyasadeva completed writing the 12 Canto of the Bhagavatam
The first and the the last three dates have been picked up from the Introduction of Sri Krsna-samhita by Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura. He gives the date of the writing of the Srimad Bhagavatam as being around 900 AD in the opinion of modern scholars and goes on to give very foolproof evidences regarding this which the modern scholars give. Though Bhaktivinoda Thakura himself put a lot of effort into writing this Intro., he leaves it upto the reader to accept it or not.
And he writes while trying to figure out a date of compiling of the Bhagavatam as per the modern scholars:
"Now we will consider the modern scholars view on the date of the appearance of Srimad Bhagavatam, the jewel of all scriptures. Not understanding our statements, third-grade people may lose all faith and consider it a recent work. Therefore they should read this section..."
also read the following veda.harekrsna.cz/encyclope...mana.htm#3
about these subjects
Four defects of the conditioned beings
Vedas as the source of transcendental knowledge
Itihasas and Puranas superior to the Vedas
Puranas superior to the Itihasas
Puranas and the three modes of nature
Bhagavata Purana (Srimad Bhagavatam) as the topmost pramana
Srimad Bhagavatam as the natural commentary on the Vedanta
Commentaries on the Srimad Bhagavatam
Sukadeva Goswami as the speaker of the Srimad Bhagavatam
Srimad Bhagavatam expounds the supreme good
Four defects of the conditioned beings are a good subject to consider. Of what use is Veda or other vedic literatures if it is a compilation of mundane opinions. YOur view regarding Veda is certainly athiestic and therefore no matter what evidence is given you cannot imagine that all Veda is consistent and has one goal.
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:43 PMof course mahabharat is considered part of vedic literature arsy! please do not give a popular example like it was compiled around 300 ad! the vedas are timeless and anything vedic can be compiled at any time. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 7:30 AMHere is the definition of Vedic literature from the dictionary. And yes this is the prevailing definitions for Hindus
www.thefreedictionary.com/Vedic...rature
-
-
-
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:06 PMHere are a few verse translation of Devi Bhagwatam Mahapurana
The Vedas said :-- Obeisance to the Devi! to the Mahamaya! to the Auspicious One! to the Creatrix of the Universe! We bow down to Thee, who is beyond the Gunas, the Ruler of all the Beings! O Mother! Thou givest to Sankara even His desires. Thou art the receptacle of all the things; Thou art the Prana of all the living beings; Thou art Buddhi, Laksmî (wealth), Sobha, (forgiveness), Shanti (peace), Sraddha (faith), Medha (intellect), Dhriti (fortitude), and Smriti (recollection).
55. Thou art the vindu (m) over the Pranava (om) and thou art of the nature of semi-moon; Thou art Gayattri, Thou art Vyarhiti; Thou art Jaya, Vijaya, Dhatri (the supportress), Lajja (modesty), Kirti (fame), Ichcha (will) and Daya (mercy) in all beings.
56-57. O Mother! Thou art the merciful Mother of the three worlds; Thou art the adorable auspicious Vidyâ (knowledge) benefitting all the Lokas; Thou destroyest the Universe and Thou skilfully residest (hidden) in the Vîja mantras. Therefore we are praising Thee. O Mother! Brahmâ, Vishnu, Mahes’vara, Indra, Sûrya, Fire, Sarasvatî and other Regents of the Universe are all Thy creation; so none of them is superior to Thee. Thou art the Mother of all the things, moving and non-moving.
58-61. O Mother ! When Thou dost will to create this visible Universe, Thou createst first Brahmâ, Vishnu and Mahes'vara and makest them create, preserve and destroy this universe; but Thou remainest quite unattached to the world. Ever Thou remainest constant in Thy one form. No one in this Universe is able to know Thy nature; nor there is any body who can enumerate Thy names. How can he promise to jump across the illimitable ocean, who cannot jump across an ordinary well.
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:48 PMthe vedas do not talk of krsna/visnu? i think u had better take a second look....RG VEDA , FIRST CHAPTER ARTSY!
om tad VISNU paramam padam, shall i go on.... krsna yajur veda etc...
and the and it is not shiv mahapurana but shiva purana, and do u realize that these are divided into 3 categories? sattvic puranas of which srimad bhagavatam is the MAHAPURANA, and the others are rajasic and subsequently tamasic puranas. and are used less than bhagavatam? u use the examples of the devi puranas and such, these are the rajasic and tamasic puranas!
in the example u give- u speak of the trimurti- krsna is above this, APRAKRTA. the words of brahma ji:
om isvara PARAMA krsna sat cit ananda vigraha
anadir adir govinda sarva karana karanam.
u give the example of krsna being a devotee of shiva, do u not remember it is krsna who was also the simple charioteer for arjuna? this is krsna's style, precisely y he is bhagavan.
" of all rudras I AM SHIVA" do u remember who says this? -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:53 PMarjuna must be God then
actually Krishna serves so very well through durga, it is He throught durga who is giving all neccecities for material life, but the miser is unappreciative. He will use any means to justify not engaging in Bhakti loving devotional service to the ParaBrahman, God.
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 1:05 PMoḿ tad viṣṇoḥ paramaḿ padaḿ sadā paśyanti sūrayah
diviva caksur atatam
tad vipraso vipanyavo
jagrvamsah samindhate
visnor yat paramam padam
Just as those with ordinary vision see the sun’s rays in the sky, so the wise and learned devotees always see the supreme abode of Lord Visnu. Because those highly praiseworthy and spiritually awake brahmanas can see that abode, they can also reveal it to others. [Rg Veda 1.22.20-21]
uhh did you read it (Vedas) or you just writing from your,,,, head?..
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 1:07 PMfrom the BrahmaSamhita the purport is also so nice
brahmasamhita.com/5/1/en
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 1:30 PMHere is a translation of Vedas on Internet. Find one reference of Krishna in there and I will concede that you have read Rg. Veda and I have not, otherwise you do the same -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 1:31 PMForgot the URL
www.hinduwebsite.com/sacreds...ntro.htm
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 1:50 PMi read the rg veda every time i go on the altar! i believe we have quoted what paricular verse.... visnu/krsna, yaaaa mentionned. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 5:32 PMyup
Om tad visnoh paramam padam (Rig Veda 1.22.20)
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 5:31 PM
HYMN XXII Asvins and Others
16 The Gods be gracious unto us even from the place whence Visnu strode
Through the seven regions of the earth!
17 Through all this world strode Visnu; thrice his foot he planted, and the whole
Was gathered in his footstep's dust.
18 Visnu, the Guardian, he whom none deceiveth, made three steps; thenceforth
Establishing his high decrees.
19 Look ye on Visnu's works, whereby the Friend of Indra, close-allied,
Hath let his holy ways be seen.
20 The princes evermore behold that loftiest place where Visnu is,
Laid as it were an eye in heaven.
21 This, Vishnu's station most sublime, the singers, ever vigilant,
Lovers of holy song, light up.
Bhagavad-gītā As It Is 2.42-43
yām imāḿ puṣpitāḿ vācaḿ
pravadanty avipaścitaḥ
veda-vāda-ratāḥ pārtha
nānyad astīti vādinaḥ
kāmātmānaḥ svarga-parā
janma-karma-phala-pradām
kriyā-viśeṣa-bahulāḿ
bhogaiśvarya-gatiḿ prati
SYNONYMS
yām imām — all these; puṣpitām — flowery; vācam — words; pravadanti — say; avipaścitaḥ — men with a poor fund of knowledge; veda-vāda-ratāḥ — supposed followers of the Vedas; pārtha — O son of Pṛthā; na — never; anyat — anything else; asti — there is; iti — thus; vādinaḥ — the advocates; kāma-ātmānaḥ — desirous of sense gratification; svarga-parāḥ — aiming to achieve heavenly planets; janma-karma-phala-pradām — resulting in good birth and other fruitive reactions; kriyā-viśeṣa — pompous ceremonies; bahulām — various; bhoga — in sense enjoyment; aiśvarya — and opulence; gatim — progress; prati — towards.
TRANSLATION
Men of small knowledge are very much attached to the flowery words of the Vedas, which recommend various fruitive activities for elevation to heavenly planets, resultant good birth, power, and so forth. Being desirous of sense gratification and opulent life, they say that there is nothing more than this.
PURPORT
People in general are not very intelligent, and due to their ignorance they are most attached to the fruitive activities recommended in the karma-kāṇḍa portions of the Vedas. They do not want anything more than sense gratificatory proposals for enjoying life in heaven, where wine and women are available and material opulence is very common. In the Vedas many sacrifices are recommended for elevation to the heavenly planets, especially the jyotiṣṭoma sacrifices. In fact, it is stated that anyone desiring elevation to heavenly planets must perform these sacrifices, and men with a poor fund of knowledge think that this is the whole purpose of Vedic wisdom. It is very difficult for such inexperienced persons to be situated in the determined action of Kṛṣṇa consciousness. As fools are attached to the flowers of poisonous trees without knowing the results of such attractions, unenlightened men are similarly attracted by such heavenly opulence and the sense enjoyment thereof.
In the karma-kāṇḍa section of the Vedas it is said, apāma somam amṛtā abhūma and akṣayyaḿ ha vai cāturmasya-yājinaḥ sukṛtaḿ bhavati. In other words, those who perform the four-month penances become eligible to drink the soma-rasa beverages to become immortal and happy forever. Even on this earth some are very eager to have soma-rasa to become strong and fit to enjoy sense gratifications. Such persons have no faith in liberation from material bondage, and they are very much attached to the pompous ceremonies of Vedic sacrifices. They are generally sensual, and they do not want anything other than the heavenly pleasures of life. It is understood that there are gardens called Nandana-kānana in which there is good opportunity for association with angelic, beautiful women and having a profuse supply of soma-rasa wine. Such bodily happiness is certainly sensual; therefore there are those who are purely attached to such material, temporary happiness, as lords of the material world.
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 6:57 AMand i quote u artsy " manu, the vedas do not speak of krsna or even visnu for that matter". i believe we can say, check mate? lol.
we have just provided some evidence that the vedas do (of course) mention visnu. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 7:24 AMThis started from your assertion that Krishna and Radharani defines bhakti parampara as in Vedas, itihaas and Puranas. Show one reference of Krishna in any Veda. Don't say Krishna Yajur Veda (as it means Black Yajur Veda) because other than the black there is no mention of Krishna (not to mention Radharani) in it. As far as Vishnu is concerned, if you have read any of the Vedas you will realize that Visnu was just another God in the pantheon much lower than Indra. BTW In RgVeda there is only one mention of Vishnu and over 2000 mentions of Indra. Even in Krishna Yajur Veda which you point to (Wrongly thinking that it is about Krishna) the Vishnu is clearly mentioned as a subsidiary of Indra and Soma. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 7:57 AMwhen u speak its like listening to what is taught in like "hinduism 101", first of all i didnt say that radharani was mentionned in the vedas, dont put words in my mouth please, and the verses mentionned, particularly the aforementionned rg veda 1.22.20 (that mention visnu) is soooo important. and just because indra is mentionned on and on (dont u think we know that? i mean please give us some credit) doesnt make him superiour. do u often find ppl praying to indra regularly? no. so i would disagree with u in the superficial assumption that visnu is just another god, given the importance of the verses mentionned above, AND THERE IS MORE THAN 1 MENTION OF VISNU in the vedas, just fyi. read above.... ohhh and u asked for just 1 mention of krsna in te vedas? how about if i give u 2?
om krsno vai sad cid ananda ghana
krsna adi purusha krsna purushottama
krsno ha u karmadi mulam
krsnah sa ha sarvaih karyah
krsnam kasam krd adhiso mukhya prabhu pujya
krsno'nadis tasminn ajandantar bahye
yan mangalamtal labhate krti om
krsna upanisad, rg veda
i can go on om svasti no govindah svasti no cyutaanantau.......
u kno what? im tired of typing. and i have responded to ur request of quoting 1 mention of krsna. (btw i know krsna means black i am not an idiot)
i feel u have not responded to the verses quoted above, from brahma samhita etc. as originally i was posting in regards to DEVI and her position and i clarified that by posting the words of brahma and the position of devi/durga etc. ohhhh by the way there is a reason that radharani is never mentionned in the vedas.... when devi parvati is inquiring to lord shiva, and asks y is the mahadevi incarnate as sri radha gopi? to which he responds, dear devi that i have explained to u b4.... shiva teaches devi that the worship of sri radha is of the highest order and this is confirmed by narada. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 8:43 AMIndra is clearly the King of Gods in Vedas, Visnu, Prajapati and Rudra, these Gods were raised to Visnu, Brahma and Shiva in post vedic Sanatan traditions. Read some independent history outside of what is told to you at Hare Krishna. This is precisely the reason most Indians almost laugh at Hare Krishnas, because they completely do not get it. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 9:03 AMinstead of insulting me, why dont u address the fact that i quoted to u where krsna is mentionned in the vedas when u said his name is not?
first of all the sentence " Read some independent history outside of what is told to you at Hare Krishna" makes no grammatical sense whatsoever. and i honestly dont know where u have been, but the majority of initiated hare krsnas are INDIAN ( been to mumbai or delhi lately? even in the west for god's sake!!!!) hehe, ooooh artsy so outta touch, cuz honey if u insult me, u bettah get ready 4 me to be a beeeeotch.
ohhh ya and as for indians laughing at us, i myself have never felt this, save from u my dear, and ALL of the indian hare krsnas i know (and there are many) are all extremely well educated and well versed in ALL of the vedas. we are taught to learn EVERYTHING, even other religious traditions, in such a way, we can hold conversations about religious pluralism....
ohhh and fyi my wife (also a vaisnavi brahmana) spent her years in university as a specialist in indian history/religion dissecting the vedas and i often helped proofread her work and thesis, which was held in very acclaim by her "indian" professors (despite the fact that she is a hare krsna? hope u felt the sarcasm there).
because someone challenges ur thoughts, u needn't get nasty and insulting, classic behaviour of someone not thoroughly informed.
ohhh fyi, we have read independant history outside of our tradition. precisely why we have come to these conclusions. just because one is born indian, doesnt give them an authority on shastra! i mean can u imagine what an ethnocentric attitude! i guess i just dont get it? i guess this is why i was asked to represent the hindu/vedic tradition by the vishwa hindu parishad.... -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 11:03 AMI was in India two weeks ago for your information. Hare Krishna is an evengelical sect much like some christian and islamic sects and frankly to me that is a complete anti-thesis of Hinduism.
The reasons Indians and most people for that matter do not take Hare Krishna seriously (besides above) is well documented. Following are just a few places where you can go and find more (I am sure you are aware of all this). All of these are documented in legal and other magzines of repute like Life etc.
us.rediff.com/news/2005/may/24hare.htm
surrealist.org/gurukula/timeline.html
www.harekrsna.org/history.htm
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 11:25 AMohhh please, ur gonna have to do better than that! ooohhhh ur showing iskcons dirty laundry, no one has ever done that! im soooo nervous. lol. boy please.
the fact that u consider sanatana dharma as "hinduism" sets u back quite a bit, so, frankly, ur opinion is if little or no consequence to me.
thank goodness most people have the good sense to not throw the baby out with the dirty bath water....
interesting that instead of addressing the fact that u were wrong (still havent admitted that i brought up krsnas name in the vedas, its ok, i understand its difficult, and the ego is a hard thing to overcome) instead u prefer to bring up things that will divert ones attention from the original post. regardless of these things u have brought up (are u just learning of them now? cuz honey its oooooooold news) iskcon is alive and well, in india (particularly) as well as abroad.
but thank u so much for ur "well" documented research. u know ur opinion of us sounds like something sooo outdated its not even funny. also thank you for trying to explain (poorly) the tradition i am a part of, but i think i ll listen to my tradition from someone like radhanatha swami, (whose hundreds of thousands of indian disciples from bombay university) among countless others who continue to inundate the subcontinent with what vedic knowledge is....
im soooo done here babe.
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 11:57 AMgreat dialog!
great links!
Artsy Coffee Bean, the links you post seem to suggest that HK is a cult. Is that what you think?
And...
Despite his obvious partisanship as boss guru of HK, is it accurate to say that Mr Prabupad is a excellent vedic translator and scholar?
Warm regards,
PB. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 12:26 PMomg and ur asking him? by his obvious replies, i mean, as if he is gonna be even slighty impartial, u might as well ask jade (sorry jade)!
and paul, just to let u kno, prabhupada is the person who brought these teachings from india to the west, he started iskcon, but, he is not the boss guru of "hare krsna" as u put it. we are vaisnava (we chant hare krsna lets not mistake the two), bhakta yogis, and prabhupada came in disciplic succession (parampara) in a long line of spiritual teachers, who have the held these practices since the time of sri krsna himself. brahma madhava gaudiya vaisnava....
he is the only person to have translated as much VEDIC literature. and his books are used in universities the world over. he is considered to be the most erudite sanskrit scholar of the 20th century. -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 7:03 PMI know Prabuhpad's excellent public reputation. I hadn't known the evil rumours around his death until those links ACB posted.
Let's see what ACB (artsycoffeebean) has to teach. He's set himself up as very erudite hasn't he? -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Thu, June 9, 2005 - 6:51 AMhahah yaa lets what hes packin'....
and i would add prabhupada's reputation wasnt only public, he taught by example (acharya) and all the rumours around his death, see the thing is, they are just that. rumours. people will stop at nothing to tarnish the reputation of a pure devotee and his disciples who all loved him. quel dommage.... time could be spent in much more beneficial ways.
-
-
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 12:49 PMwhat the hell is Hinduism, (those who live on the other side, non muslim side of the Shinhu River)?
There is no such thing a religion called hinduism
what makes one a hindu In fact no reffered to themselves as hindus before the british arrival. It was due to intellectual imperialism that India united under a blanketing term of hinduism. The main presentation of it was of the ideology of Sripad Sankaracarya the founder of the Mayavada sect. with a mild blend of various ideolgies. This was done at an effort against the british who claimed that the indians did not have a single religion and were therefore intellectually at loss due this lack of common belief. Can anyone prove that there is actually a religion called hinduism? Or can it be accepted as just a regional designation. Where do you find the word Hindu in the Vedas.
If you want to talk about Vedic culture that is another thing but hinduism ??
-
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 10:31 AMdoes this have to go up again
SB 1.4.15: Once upon a time he [Vyāsadeva], as the sun rose, took his morning ablution in the waters of the Sarasvatī and sat alone to concentrate.
SB 1.4.16: The great sage Vyāsadeva saw anomalies in the duties of the millennium. This happens on the earth in different ages, due to unseen forces in the course of time.
SB 1.4.17-18: The great sage, who was fully equipped in knowledge, could see, through his transcendental vision, the deterioration of everything material, due to the influence of the age. He could also see that the faithless people in general would be reduced in duration of life and would be impatient due to lack of goodness. Thus he contemplated for the welfare of men in all statuses and orders of life.
SB 1.4.19: He saw that the sacrifices mentioned in the Vedas were means by which the people's occupations could be purified. And to simplify the process he divided the one Veda into four, in order to expand them among men.
SB 1.4.20: The four divisions of the original sources of knowledge [the Vedas] were made separately. But the historical facts and authentic stories mentioned in the Purāṇas are called the fifth Veda.
SB 1.4.21: After the Vedas were divided into four divisions, Paila Ṛṣi became the professor of the Ṛg Veda, Jaimini the professor of the Sāma Veda, and Vaiśampāyana alone became glorified by the Yajur Veda.
SB 1.4.22: The Sumantu Muni Ańgirā, who was very devotedly engaged, was entrusted with the Atharva Veda. And my father, Romaharṣaṇa, was entrusted with the Purāṇas and historical record
SB 1.4.23: All these learned scholars, in their turn, rendered their entrusted Vedas unto their many disciples, grand-disciples and great grand-disciples, and thus the respective branches of the followers of the Vedas came into being.
SB 1.4.24: Thus the great sage Vyāsadeva, who is very kind to the ignorant masses, edited the Vedas so they might be assimilated by less intellectual men.
SB 1.4.25: Out of compassion, the great sage thought it wise that this would enable men to achieve the ultimate goal of life. Thus he compiled the great historical narration called the Mahābhārata for women, laborers and friends of the twice-born.
SB 1.4.26: O twice-born brāhmaṇas, still his mind was not satisfied, although he engaged himself in working for the total welfare of all people.
SB 1.4.27: Thus the sage, being dissatisfied at heart, at once began to reflect, because he knew the essence of religion, and he said within himself:
SB 1.4.28-29: I have, under strict disciplinary vows, unpretentiously worshiped the Vedas, the spiritual master and the altar of sacrifice. I have also abided by the rulings and have shown the import of disciplic succession through the explanation of the Mahābhārata, by which even women, śūdras and others [friends of the twice-born] can see the path of religion.
SB 1.4.30: I am feeling incomplete, though I myself am fully equipped with everything required by the Vedas.
SB 1.4.31: This may be because I did not specifically point out the devotional service of the Lord, which is dear both to perfect beings and to the infallible Lord.
SB 1.4.32: As mentioned before, Nārada reached the cottage of Kṛṣṇa-dvaipāyana Vyāsa on the banks of the Sarasvatī just as Vyāsadeva was regretting his defects.
SB 1.4.33: At the auspicious arrival of Śrī Nārada, Śrī Vyāsadeva got up respectfully and worshiped him, giving him veneration equal to that given to Brahmājī, the creator.
Canto 1: Creation Chapter 4: The Appearance of Śrī Nārada
Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Śrīmad Bhāgavatam
Canto 1: Creation Chapter 5: Nārada's Instructions on Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam for Vyāsadeva
Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Śrīmad Bhāgavatam
SB 1.5.1: Sūta Gosvāmī said: Thus the sage amongst the gods [Nārada], comfortably seated and apparently smiling, addressed the ṛṣi amongst the brāhmaṇas [Vedavyāsa].
SB 1.5.2: Addressing Vyāsadeva, the son of Parāśara, Nārada inquired: Are you satisfied by identifying with the body or the mind as objects of self-realization?
SB 1.5.3: Your inquiries were full and your studies were also well fulfilled, and there is no doubt that you have prepared a great and wonderful work, the Mahābhārata, which is full of all kinds of Vedic sequences elaborately explained.
SB 1.5.4: You have fully delineated the subject of impersonal Brahman as well as the knowledge derived therefrom. Why should you be despondent in spite of all this, thinking that you are undone, my dear prabhu?
SB 1.5.5: Śrī Vyāsadeva said: All you have said about me is perfectly correct. Despite all this, I am not pacified. I therefore question you about the root cause of my dissatisfaction, for you are a man of unlimited knowledge due to your being the offspring of one [Brahmā] who is self-born [without mundane father and mother].
SB 1.5.6: My lord! Everything that is mysterious is known to you because you worship the creator and destroyer of the material world and the maintainer of the spiritual world, the original Personality of Godhead, who is transcendental to the three modes of material nature.
SB 1.5.7: Like the sun, Your Goodness can travel everywhere in the three worlds, and like the air you can penetrate the internal region of everyone. As such, you are as good as the all-pervasive Supersoul. Please, therefore, find out the deficiency in me, despite my being absorbed in transcendence under disciplinary regulations and vows.
SB 1.5.8: Śrī Nārada said: You have not actually broadcast the sublime and spotless glories of the Personality of Godhead. That philosophy which does not satisfy the transcendental senses of the Lord is considered worthless.
SB 1.5.9: Although, great sage, you have very broadly described the four principles beginning with religious performances, you have not described the glories of the Supreme Personality, Vāsudeva.
SB 1.5.10: Those words which do not describe the glories of the Lord, who alone can sanctify the atmosphere of the whole universe, are considered by saintly persons to be like unto a place of pilgrimage for crows. Since the all-perfect persons are inhabitants of the transcendental abode, they do not derive any pleasure there.
SB 1.5.11: On the other hand, that literature which is full of descriptions of the transcendental glories of the name, fame, forms, pastimes, etc., of the unlimited Supreme Lord is a different creation, full of transcendental words directed toward bringing about a revolution in the impious lives of this world's misdirected civilization. Such transcendental literatures, even though imperfectly composed, are heard, sung and accepted by purified men who are thoroughly honest.
SB 1.5.12: Knowledge of self-realization, even though free from all material affinity, does not look well if devoid of a conception of the Infallible [God]. What, then, is the use of fruitive activities, which are naturally painful from the very beginning and transient by nature, if they are not utilized for the devotional service of the Lord?
SB 1.5.13: O Vyāsadeva, your vision is completely perfect. Your good fame is spotless. You are firm in vow and situated in truthfulness. And thus you can think of the pastimes of the Lord in trance for the liberation of the people in general from all material bondage.
SB 1.5.14: Whatever you desire to describe that is separate in vision from the Lord simply reacts, with different forms, names and results, to agitate the mind as the wind agitates a boat which has no resting place.
SB 1.5.15: The people in general are naturally inclined to enjoy, and you have encouraged them in that way in the name of religion. This is verily condemned and is quite unreasonable. Because they are guided under your instructions, they will accept such activities in the name of religion and will hardly care for prohibitions.
SB 1.5.16: The Supreme Lord is unlimited. Only a very expert personality, retired from the activities of material happiness, deserves to understand this knowledge of spiritual values. Therefore those who are not so well situated, due to material attachment, should be shown the ways of transcendental realization, by Your Goodness, through descriptions of the transcendental activities of the Supreme Lord.
SB 1.5.17: One who has forsaken his material occupations to engage in the devotional service of the Lord may sometimes fall down while in an immature stage, yet there is no danger of his being unsuccessful. On the other hand, a nondevotee, though fully engaged in occupational duties, does not gain anything.
SB 1.5.18: Persons who are actually intelligent and philosophically inclined should endeavor only for that purposeful end which is not obtainable even by wandering from the topmost planet [Brahmaloka] down to the lowest planet [Pātāla]. As far as happiness derived from sense enjoyment is concerned, it can be obtained automatically in course of time, just as in course of time we obtain miseries even though we do not desire them.
SB 1.5.19: My dear Vyāsa, even though a devotee of Lord Kṛṣṇa sometimes falls down somehow or other, he certainly does not undergo material existence like others [fruitive workers, etc.] because a person who has once relished the taste of the lotus feet of the Lord can do nothing but remember that ecstasy again and again.
SB 1.5.20: The Supreme Lord Personality of Godhead is Himself this cosmos, and still He is aloof from it. From Him only has this cosmic manifestation emanated, in Him it rests, and unto Him it enters after annihilation. Your good self knows all about this. I have given only a synopsis.
SB 1.5.21: Your Goodness has perfect vision. You yourself can know the Supersoul Personality of Godhead because you are present as the plenary portion of the Lord. Although you are birthless, you have appeared on this earth for the well-being of all people. Please, therefore, describe the transcendental pastimes of the Supreme Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa more vividly.
SB 1.5.22: Learned circles have positively concluded that the infallible purpose of the advancement of knowledge, namely austerities, study of the Vedas, sacrifice, chanting of hymns and charity, culminates in the transcendental descriptions of the Lord, who is defined in choice poetry.
SB 1.5.23: O muni, in the last millennium I was born as the son of a certain maidservant engaged in the service of brāhmaṇas who were following the principles of Vedānta. When they were living together during the four months of the rainy season, I was engaged in their personal service.
SB 1.5.24: Although they were impartial by nature, those followers of the Vedānta blessed me with their causeless mercy. As far as I was concerned, I was self-controlled and had no attachment for sports, even though I was a boy. In addition, I was not naughty, and I did not speak more than required.
SB 1.5.25: Once only, by their permission, I took the remnants of their food, and by so doing all my sins were at once eradicated. Thus being engaged, I became purified in heart, and at that time the very nature of the transcendentalist became attractive to me.
SB 1.5.26: O Vyāsadeva, in that association and by the mercy of those great Vedāntists, I could hear them describe the attractive activities of Lord Kṛṣṇa And thus listening attentively, my taste for hearing of the Personality of Godhead increased at every step.
SB 1.5.27: O great sage, as soon as I got a taste for the Personality of Godhead, my attention to hear of the Lord was unflinching. And as my taste developed, I could realize that it was only in my ignorance that I had accepted gross and subtle coverings, for both the Lord and I are transcendental.
SB 1.5.28: Thus during two seasons — the rainy season and autumn — I had the opportunity to hear these great-souled sages constantly chant the unadulterated glories of the Lord Hari. As the flow of my devotional service began, the coverings of the modes of passion and ignorance vanished.
SB 1.5.29: I was very much attached to those sages. I was gentle in behavior, and all my sins were eradicated in their service. In my heart I had strong faith in them. I had subjugated the senses, and I was strictly following them with body and mind.
SB 1.5.30: As they were leaving, those bhakti-vedāntas, who are very kind to poor-hearted souls, instructed me in that most confidential subject which is instructed by the Personality of Godhead Himself.
SB 1.5.31: By that confidential knowledge, I could understand clearly the influence of the energy of Lord Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the creator, maintainer and annihilator of everything. By knowing that, one can return to Him and personally meet Him.
SB 1.5.32: O Brāhmaṇa Vyāsadeva, it is decided by the learned that the best remedial measure for removing all troubles and miseries is to dedicate one's activities to the service of the Supreme Lord Personality of Godhead [Śrī Kṛṣṇa].
SB 1.5.33: O good soul, does not a thing, applied therapeutically, cure a disease which was caused by that very same thing?
SB 1.5.34: Thus when all a man's activities are dedicated to the service of the Lord, those very activities which caused his perpetual bondage become the destroyer of the tree of work.
SB 1.5.35: Whatever work is done here in this life for the satisfaction of the mission of the Lord is called bhakti-yoga, or transcendental loving service to the Lord, and what is called knowledge becomes a concomitant factor.
SB 1.5.36: While performing duties according to the order of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, one constantly remembers Him, His names and His qualities.
SB 1.5.37: Let us all chant the glories of Vāsudeva along with His plenary expansions Pradyumna, Aniruddha and Sańkarṣaṇa.
SB 1.5.38: Thus he is the actual seer who worships, in the form of transcendental sound representation, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Viṣṇu, who has no material form.
SB 1.5.39: O brāhmaṇa, thus by the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa I was endowed first with the transcendental knowledge of the Lord as inculcated in the confidential parts of the Vedas, then with the spiritual opulences, and then with His intimate loving service.
SB 1.5.40: Please, therefore, describe the Almighty Lord's activities which you have learned by your vast knowledge of the Vedas, for that will satisfy the hankerings of great learned men and at the same time mitigate the miseries of the masses of common people who are always suffering from material pangs. Indeed, there is no other way to get out of such miseries.
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Wed, June 8, 2005 - 10:32 AMŚrīmad Bhāgavatam 1.5.40
tvam apy adabhra-śruta viśrutaḿ vibhoḥ
samāpyate yena vidāḿ bubhutsitam
prākhyāhi duḥkhair muhur arditātmanāḿ
sańkleśa-nirvāṇam uśanti nānyathā
SYNONYMS
tvam — your good soul; api — also; adabhra — vast; śruta — Vedic literatures; viśrutam — have heard also; vibhoḥ — of the Almighty; samāpyate — satisfied; yena — by which; vidām — of the learned; bubhutsitam — who always desire to learn transcendental knowledge; prākhyāhi — describe; duḥkhaiḥ — by miseries; muhuḥ — always; ardita-ātmanām — suffering mass of people; sańkleśa — sufferings; nirvāṇam — mitigation; uśanti na — do not get out of; anyathā — by other means.
TRANSLATION
(OH Vyasa compiler of the Vedas) Please, therefore, describe the Almighty Lord's activities which you have learned by your vast knowledge of the Vedas(in the form of Srimad Bhagavatam), for that will satisfy the hankerings of great learned men and at the same time mitigate the miseries of the masses of common people who are always suffering from material pangs. Indeed, there is no other way to get out of such miseries.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 1:06 PMin response to this artsy i would ask u to read the following words of brahma ji :
lowest of all is located in devi dhama (mundane world) next above it is mahesh dhama (the abode of shiva) above mahesh dhama is a place called hari dhama (the place of visnu) and above them all is located krsna's own realm named goloka, i adore the primeval lord govinda, who has allotted their respective authorities to the rulers of those graded realms.
and furhermore (also in the words of brahma)
the external potency maya who is of the nature of the shadow of the cit potency, is worshipped by all people as durga, the creating, preserving and destroying agency of the mundane world. i adore the primeval lord govinda, in accordance with whose will durga conducts herself.
-brahma samhita -
-
Re: pollution from bad source
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 1:14 PMyou cant mess with text, they all compliment each other, fully consistent. Anything else Shastricly related? I suggest that you write more from you head, because the Vedic literatures is not going to support your ideas well. Maybe study a little more and then come back and bought it out. -
-
Shakta texts
Thu, June 9, 2005 - 6:38 AMThere are many shakta texts. e.g. --
The Devi Gita, part of The Devi Bhagavatam
The Devi Mahatmyam (aka the Chandi, part of the markendya purana)
Sri Lalita Sahasranama
All of the above are used both for chatning and as theosophical discourses.
And this is without entering the agamic corpus... -
-
Re: Shakta texts
Thu, June 9, 2005 - 7:08 AMi am aware of all of these texts, do not deny their existance, and have read them all. i particularly like to chant chant lalita sahasranama. om vraja tachala.... its beautiful. now, that said.
devi gita, mahatmya and devi bhagavatam are part of the tamasic puranas. all of the puranas are divided into 3 gunas, befitting the modes of nature. as srila vyasadeva (the literary incarnation of god) explains that the cream of vedic literature can be found in the srimad bhagavatam (which is in the sattvic category). if u read the post nitya has placed above, u can understand what we are trying to convey.... devi has her place, we pray to her in her full aspect (purna shakti) of radharani. again the posts and verses supporing this are above.
when one has read ALL of the puranas and understood them, we understand the position of each personality. then one cannot argue that durga/parvati/uma/devi is in charge of devi dhama, the mundane world and all that it encompasses. if one is seeking something transcendant, that which is above the mundane, he goes to radharani, who according to brahma, narada, shiva and parvati herself is the MAHADEVI. om tat sat. -
-
-
Re: Shakta texts
Thu, June 9, 2005 - 10:37 AMCult is short for "Culture" Christianity is also a Cult! -
-
Re: Shakta texts
Thu, June 9, 2005 - 8:47 PMHello again Wendy,
"Cult is short for "Culture" Christianity is also a Cult!"
"Cult" does not equal "culture". They are different words entirely.
Christianity is not a cult as it seems to be generally defined but rather it is generally referred to as a "religion".
Rgds,
Paul Bard. -
-
Re: Shakta texts
Thu, June 9, 2005 - 9:22 PMThe word has different meanings "A system or community of religious worship and ritual. " being one of them. This is another meaning, "An exclusive group of persons sharing an esoteric, usually artistic or intellectual interest." "
A usually nonscientific method or regimen claimed by its originator to have exclusive or exceptional power in curing a particular disease. " is another one
in old india the english word cult was used by different schools to identify differences, actually even Srila Prabhupada said "bhakti cult"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-